• Beware of Counterfeit Woodturning Tools (click here for details)
  • Johnathan Silwones is starting a new AAW chapter, Southern Alleghenies Woodturners, in Johnstown, PA. (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Keven Jesequel for "Big Leaf Maple" being selected as Turning of the Week for April 15, 2024 (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

Gentex Pureflo 3000 PAPR mini-review

Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
307
Likes
414
Location
Eastern Washington
I received my Gentex Pureflo 3000 powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) a few months ago and thought I would share my thoughts about it. It replaced my Trend Airshield Pro and as that is the only other PAPR I’ve used I can only compare Gentex to it.


Like the Airshield Pro, the Pureflo is a self contained unit. But with better impact protection and better filtration. The Pureflo comes with a hepa filter and optional prefilters and carbon filters are available. It comes with one visor protector and packs of four replacements are available. The Pureflo comes with two lithium batteries and a charger.


Filtration;
Trend has two filters with an efficiency of 98% and filters to .6 micron
Pureflo has one hepa filter with an efficiency of 99.97 and filters down to .3 micron


Airflow;
Trend is rated at 7.06 cfm with a fully charged battery (5.6 cfm minimum)
Pureflo is rated at 7.7 cfm (6 cfm minimum)
When using the Pureflo I have never felt the need for more air, breathing is quite easy.


Power;
Trend includes one battery and a charger. Run time is rated at 8 hours
Gentex includes two lithium batteries and a charger. Each battery is rated at 4 hours of run time and only takes two hours to charge. Uses one battery at a time
I haven’t run down a battery yet and have worn this up to three hours at a time. Charging is quick at two hours so a charged battery will always be available.


Weight with the battery installed;
Trend 2 pounds 7 ounces
Pureflo 3 pounds 2 ounces
The Pureflo is heavier when looking at the numbers above but I never would have guessed that by wearing it. The head band is a completely different style than the Trend’s, is much more comfortable and the helmet is very well balanced. I don’t find my head feeling top heavy at all, which I did with the Trend. Gentex does offer the Pureflo with a bump cap style hat instead of the hard hat, the bump cap is one pound less.


Loudness;
The measurements were taken in my shop with no external equipment running while using an app on my phone. Measured near the ears the Trend’s motor was 60db while the Pureflow was 54db. Both the Trend and Pureflo allow the addition of ear muffs. The trend uses a proprietary ear muff while the Pureflo will accept any ear muff designed for hard hats, including those that have bluetooth or a built in radio.


Comfort;
The Trend’s head band is like most of our faceshields, its a band that goes around the top of our head. The Trend always felt top heavy, a bit out of balance and when ever I tilted my head it felt like my head wanted to keep going because of the weight. This caused neck strain for me if I was wearing the Trend for an extended period of time. The Pureflo has a band that in the back is lower and sets below the skull. The band is very well padded so I almost never know its there when I have it on. The weight is well balanced and because of the band’s design (and despite the heavier weight) I don’t get any neck strain. I can tilt my head and not have to fight against the weight of the helmet. Its much more enjoyable to wear.


Cost;
There is a significant cost difference between the Trend and the Pureflo 3000, but there is also a significant difference between the two units. The Pureflo feels like a more robust, commercial grade unit. The Trend runs about $450 to $500. I purchased my Gentex Pureflo 3000 with a four pack of visor protectors and a pack of carbon filters. With shipping it was about twice the price of the Trend.


A Note, I have never worn a belt type PAPR so I can’t compare to those. I chose the Gentex because of its ease to put on and take off.


Below are some comparison photos.


pf1.jpg pf2.jpg pf3.jpg pf4.jpg pf5.jpg
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Messages
2
Likes
1
Location
Houston, TX
I received my Gentex Pureflo 3000 powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) a few months ago and thought I would share my thoughts about it. It replaced my Trend Airshield Pro and as that is the only other PAPR I’ve used I can only compare Gentex to it.


Like the Airshield Pro, the Pureflo is a self contained unit. But with better impact protection and better filtration. The Pureflo comes with a hepa filter and optional prefilters and carbon filters are available. It comes with one visor protector and packs of four replacements are available. The Pureflo comes with two lithium batteries and a charger.


Filtration;
Trend has two filters with an efficiency of 98% and filters to .6 micron
Pureflo has one hepa filter with an efficiency of 99.97 and filters down to .3 micron


Airflow;
Trend is rated at 7.06 cfm with a fully charged battery (5.6 cfm minimum)
Pureflo is rated at 7.7 cfm (6 cfm minimum)
When using the Pureflo I have never felt the need for more air, breathing is quite easy.


Power;
Trend includes one battery and a charger. Run time is rated at 8 hours
Gentex includes two lithium batteries and a charger. Each battery is rated at 4 hours of run time and only takes two hours to charge. Uses one battery at a time
I haven’t run down a battery yet and have worn this up to three hours at a time. Charging is quick at two hours so a charged battery will always be available.


Weight with the battery installed;
Trend 2 pounds 7 ounces
Pureflo 3 pounds 2 ounces
The Pureflo is heavier when looking at the numbers above but I never would have guessed that by wearing it. The head band is a completely different style than the Trend’s, is much more comfortable and the helmet is very well balanced. I don’t find my head feeling top heavy at all, which I did with the Trend. Gentex does offer the Pureflo with a bump cap style hat instead of the hard hat, the bump cap is one pound less.


Loudness;
The measurements were taken in my shop with no external equipment running while using an app on my phone. Measured near the ears the Trend’s motor was 60db while the Pureflow was 54db. Both the Trend and Pureflo allow the addition of ear muffs. The trend uses a proprietary ear muff while the Pureflo will accept any ear muff designed for hard hats, including those that have bluetooth or a built in radio.


Comfort;
The Trend’s head band is like most of our faceshields, its a band that goes around the top of our head. The Trend always felt top heavy, a bit out of balance and when ever I tilted my head it felt like my head wanted to keep going because of the weight. This caused neck strain for me if I was wearing the Trend for an extended period of time. The Pureflo has a band that in the back is lower and sets below the skull. The band is very well padded so I almost never know its there when I have it on. The weight is well balanced and because of the band’s design (and despite the heavier weight) I don’t get any neck strain. I can tilt my head and not have to fight against the weight of the helmet. Its much more enjoyable to wear.


Cost;
There is a significant cost difference between the Trend and the Pureflo 3000, but there is also a significant difference between the two units. The Pureflo feels like a more robust, commercial grade unit. The Trend runs about $450 to $500. I purchased my Gentex Pureflo 3000 with a four pack of visor protectors and a pack of carbon filters. With shipping it was about twice the price of the Trend.


A Note, I have never worn a belt type PAPR so I can’t compare to those. I chose the Gentex because of its ease to put on and take off.


Below are some comparison photos.


View attachment 36273 View attachment 36274 View attachment 36275 View attachment 36276 View attachment 36277
This is a great review and comparison. I was wondering where you purchased this from? I noticed it said it was about twice the cost of the Trend, but the only place I was able to find the Pureflo was selling it for almost three times as much as the Trend, and that was without visor protectors or carbon filters. I realize prices may have changed since you posted this, but any help finding a place where I can purchase this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
307
Likes
414
Location
Eastern Washington
This is a great review and comparison. I was wondering where you purchased this from? I noticed it said it was about twice the cost of the Trend, but the only place I was able to find the Pureflo was selling it for almost three times as much as the Trend, and that was without visor protectors or carbon filters. I realize prices may have changed since you posted this, but any help finding a place where I can purchase this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Hi Frank,

I purchased my Pureflo from www.afcintl.com. John was pretty responsive by email both before and after the sale. I had to email to get a price, it was the best pricing at the time I was shopping last year. I have no idea what the pricing or availability is this year. I still like it very much.

Damon
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2021
Messages
2
Likes
1
Location
Houston, TX
Hi Frank,

I purchased my Pureflo from www.afcintl.com. John was pretty responsive by email both before and after the sale. I had to email to get a price, it was the best pricing at the time I was shopping last year. I have no idea what the pricing or availability is this year. I still like it very much.

Damon
Thank you for taking the time to respond. This helps a lot and I’ll definitely be contacting them.
 
Back
Top