• We just finished moving the forums to a new hosting server. It looks like everything is functioning correctly but if you find a problem please report it in the Forum Technical Support Forum (click here) or email us at forum_moderator AT aawforum.org. Thanks!
  • Beware of Counterfeit Woodturning Tools (click here for details)
  • Johnathan Silwones is starting a new AAW chapter, Southern Alleghenies Woodturners, in Johnstown, PA. (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Dave Roberts for "2 Hats" being selected as Turning of the Week for April 22, 2024 (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

Powermatic ad on page 41 of the 2021 Virtual Symposium Guide

Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
279
Likes
1,842
Location
North Ogden, Utah
I think this has come up before but because I'm an active member of WOW and not an AAW member I thought I would bring this to the attention of someone here that has some "pull". On page 41 of the 2021 Symposium guide is a Powermatic ad. I seem to recall that this or a similar ad stirred folks up once or twice before. It includes of photo of a nice shiny new PM3520C with a big log between centers. Probably too big of a log to be safe in some opinions. It's obviously a staged photo for advertising purposes, at least obvious to me. But to some I guess the photo with the accompanying "pushing the limit" verbiage could be construed as promoting an unsafe situation. Somehow someone somewhere should do something about this recurring ad.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
279
Likes
1,842
Location
North Ogden, Utah
In your opinion, what's the "unsafe situation"? What action(s) should be taken to remedy the "unsafe situation"? What do you recommend doing about the ad? - John
Well, my opinion really isn't why I posted this. At least not my opinion on how safe it looks. But it has always bugged me when a tool maker or some other entity of the woodturning world gets "thrown under the bus" without a chance to defend themselves. I think Powermatic is a good company even though I've never owned or even turned on a PM lathe. I also think the AAW is a great organization interested in making woodturning a safe hobby. Not up to me to defend either. But I just thought both should think about how an ad like this in the premier national (and even international) publication can affect a lot of woodturners, many negatively. A picture is worth a thousand words. Much ado about nothing? Probably. I probably should have stayed out of it.
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
279
Likes
1,842
Location
North Ogden, Utah
I probably described it wrong in my original post. I should have said "too long of a log" instead of "too big of a log". That tailstock overhanging the the end of the ways is the issue being discussed.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 28, 2021
Messages
1,225
Likes
1,075
Location
Roulette, PA
Website
www.reallyruralwoodworks.com
I probably described it wrong in my original post. I should have said "too long of a log" instead of "too short of a log". That tailstock overhanging the the end of the ways is the issue being discussed.
I still don't see the problem - if the tailstock holds securely hanging like that, I'd presume by design, I don't see where it is a problem..
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Messages
456
Likes
480
Location
Tallahassee, FL
You would have better luck directly contacting the vendor instead of posting to the customers. But the ad did it's job, people are talking about it and the lathe. :)
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
5,488
Likes
2,836
Location
Eugene, OR
Hmm, thought I posted on this, but don't see my response. I would never show an add like this if that was my lathe. The tailstock needs, at the very minimum, the full contact of the pressure plate on the bottom to be in contact with the lathe bed. They are generally located in the middle of the tailstock. That picture, to me, indicates that the pressure plate is barely in contact with the lathe bed. It might work if you had a router set up on a sled and were using a speed of 50 rpm or less. No way would I use that type of mount if I was roughing with hand tools.

Engineer's conundrum, "You can never invent some thing that is idiot proof because as soon as you do, some one invents a better idiot." Some idiot will see the add and try to do the same thing. No, just plain, big NO!

robo hippy
 

odie

TOTW Team
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
7,116
Likes
9,818
Location
Panning for Montana gold, with Betsy, the mule!
If the log is mounted securely and starting speed is slow enough to prevent vibration I see no problem turning a log like that. Might make an interesting pedestal. Level of experience is what matters here.

Kind of what I thought. At a slow enough rpm, it ought to be safe enough. What bothers me a little is the tailstock only being supported by a couple inches of the bedways. The rest hanging off the cliff edge......that ought to be a red flag.

edit: Oops, I didn't read the whole thread before I posted this. I see this tailstock issue is being discussed here......carry on, gentlemen!

-----odie-----
 
Joined
Oct 24, 2006
Messages
23
Likes
30
Location
Dillsburg, PA
I’ve yet to see any responses from 3520C owners, so I went down to my shop and snapped a few pictures to show how the tailstock is engineered. First of all, this is a pretty massive tailstock—over 50 pounds if I recall correctly. The pressure plate is located at the far front, so even when the back end is hanging off the end of the ways, the plate is still in full contact with the ways—the pictures show this.

I think there are a lot of variables that factor into the safe/unsafe question and in this situation we simply don’t know them all. How is it attached at the headstock? How fast will it be turned? What tools will be used? What end result is the turner even trying to achieve?

I haven’t turned any piece of wood quite like the one in the ad before, but having spent about a year with my 3520C so far, the strength of my tailstock, even hanging over the edge a bit, wouldn’t be my first worry with a piece like this.
 

Attachments

  • 4B1E09C5-C9DE-454A-8346-B07FCA944626.jpeg
    4B1E09C5-C9DE-454A-8346-B07FCA944626.jpeg
    312.8 KB · Views: 23
  • ED80B571-0A52-46B1-A55A-99D26D6EBC1E.jpeg
    ED80B571-0A52-46B1-A55A-99D26D6EBC1E.jpeg
    363.1 KB · Views: 23
  • F1A762E6-79EA-4705-93F2-A0754F93B907.jpeg
    F1A762E6-79EA-4705-93F2-A0754F93B907.jpeg
    390.8 KB · Views: 23
Joined
Feb 5, 2017
Messages
12
Likes
8
Location
Leawood, Kansas
Here's a link to a PM video ad with a couple of short clips with the lathe turned on with the log mounted:

 
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
5,488
Likes
2,836
Location
Eugene, OR
Not sure, but isn't that Ernie Conover doing the turning?

If I was to turn a log like the one in the video, I would have done a lot of chainsaw work on it first before mounting it on the lathe.

robo hippy
 
Back
Top