• The forum upgrades have been completed. These were moderate security fixes from our software vendor and it looks like everything is working well. If you see any problems please post in the Forum Technical Support forum or email us at forum_moderator (at) aawforum.org. Thank you
  • Congratulations to Bernie Hyrtzak, People's Choice in the January 2026 Turning Challenge (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Matt Carvalho for "Red Mallee Folded Form" being selected as Turning of the Week for February 9, 2026 (click here for details)
  • AAW Symposium demonstrators announced - If the 2026 AAW International Woodturning Symposium is not on your calendar, now is the time to register. And there are discounts available if you sign up early, by Feb. 28. Early Bird pricing gives you the best rate for our 40th Anniversary Symposium in Raleigh, North Carolina, June 4–7, 2026. (There are discounts for AAW chapter members too) For more information vist the discussion thread here or the AAW registration page
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

110 Volt vs. 220 Volt Lathe

James Seyfried said:
Probably would have if they knew they were talking to a lawyer though. :)



The inspector is the judge and areas can make and interpret code differently. But I find that odd as it would really make it difficult and expensive for spas that require two GFCIs. Some have a separate one for the heater.



I was just pulling you chain a little. I apologize if I have offended you.
Click to expand...

Perhaps TW waded this am. de nada.

I did a full r&r on our master bath. Had had a Jaq on a timer (just replacing what was there). Replaced with a Kohler "soak tub" that required two GFCI circuits (pump and heater) as well as bonding and secondary ground. Inspector about drove me nuts as he insisted on visually tracing both circuits from panel to tub before he'd let me close up the ceiling. He actually said that code required "the circuit to be GFCI" meaning from panel onward. BSOM, I'm just follerin' orders. :D
 
I took a Master Electrician class about forty years ago and the instructor was the chief inspector for Dallas County. He was a really sharp guy and knew the code inside out. He said that the code isn't vague at all, but unfortunately chief inspectors in many rural counties are too often just some jack leg electrician who doesn't know brown stuff from Shinola.

This isn't to say that the NEC is an easy read. It isn't. But it's no worse than the Texas Constitution. :rolleyes: Without the investment in time to thoroughly learn it, it would appear to be open to interpretation. That said, local governments have some flexibility in implementation.
 
Last edited:
Cialis

Bill Boehme said:
This isn't to say that the NEC is an easy read. It isn't. But it's no worse than the Texas Constitution. :rolleyes: Without the investment in time to thoroughly learn it, it
would appear to be open to interpretation. That said, local governments have some flexibility in implementation.
Click to expand...

Appears that I had a "strict constructionist" for an inspector (based on how HE reads the code, of course) :D

Since Fellini died, I'm still looking for somebody to explain the "2-tubs" situation . . .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top