• We are in the process of upgrading the forums today, Sunday, February 8th. The forums may be responding slowly or may be offline during periods throughout the day. This work should be finished by midday. Thank you for your patience.
  • Congratulations to Bernie Hyrtzak, People's Choice in the January 2026 Turning Challenge (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to David Croxton for "Geri's Basket Illusion" being selected as Turning of the Week for February 2, 2026 (click here for details)
  • AAW Symposium demonstrators announced - If the 2026 AAW International Woodturning Symposium is not on your calendar, now is the time to register. And there are discounts available if you sign up early, by Feb. 28. Early Bird pricing gives you the best rate for our 40th Anniversary Symposium in Raleigh, North Carolina, June 4–7, 2026. (There are discounts for AAW chapter members too) For more information vist the discussion thread here or the AAW registration page
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

Does anyone have a Legacy CNC

Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
19
Likes
0
Location
Clarkston, MI
Website
www.thewoodworkersnetwork.com
I have had a manual Legacy 1200 for many years. I use it for roping, barley twisting, and fluting. Recently I purchased their CNC upgrade which was to give me a 5 axis CNC.

The learning curve is a great deal steeper than what the salesman promised. I also question its basic proformance I don't mean to bore my fellow "forumites" with sad details but I would like to hear from anyone that has purchased a Legacy CNC and to hear experience with the machine.
 
I'm not a mechanical engineer, but that seems to be the bane of many movable contraptions with less than jewel-like precision.

If your "second cut" is in the reverse direction of the first, you may find it helpful to program (or manually interfere) so that the cutter is lifted away from the workpiece on the reverse move, and make the second cut in the same direction as the first. Further, attach counterweights or springs to the tool carrier, so that the guiding surfaces are always against one another. It might even be possible to mount the machinery, tilted each way, so that gravity by itself provides this function. And, upon reflection, the hand-fired versions of these tools could also probably be enhanced this way.

See the recent discussion on Cross Slide Vises for more thoughts on reducing slop and backlash.
 
Back
Top