Do the different coring tools out there produce different profiles or all they all about the same?
There are 2 basic types, fixed path (Oneway, Woodcut) and what I’ll call flex path (McNaughton, Michelsen).
Fixed - have a fixed pivot for the blade, user sets the pivot point. The radius for each blade is fixed, so the profile cut is fixed, but the user selects the thickness of the core. A thicker core allows more profile change. The pivot point selection determines how much of a 1/4 circle is cut. Just imagine a 90 deg 1/4 circle, but you may only want the last 45 deg, a broad, shallow bowl.
Flex path - the pivot itself can move allowing a bit more shaping of the profile. That flex path has limits, as the blade has to have clearance, and these are more difficult to learn, as the blade can be “caught” in the kerf. Based on comments in this forum, these require a bit more lathe hp due to the catching of the blade in the kerf.
I have the woodcut bowlsaver 2 blade. I have no problem using it with a Nova Galaxi at 120v, which specs at 1.75 hp (the dvr motor does have more low speed torq vs vfd lathes). Ive been very pleased with the results, and wish I had gotten the 3 blade version. I did not understand how the pivot point could be moved around, as well as core thickness, to alter the final bowl shape. A 17” bowl blade can be used to produce a 12” bowl with a shallow profile (say the last 45 deg of rotation) and with enough thickness, the rim can be shaped however with a gouge.
The biggest difference between the OW and BS is blade support. The OW has a blade support that is moved into the kerf (manually) as the cut is made deeper. The BS hangs the blade out over a support. For the ~13” max core size my 2 blade can do, there’s no issue, but cant speak to how the larger blade would act. Theoretically the supported blade is better, but isnt needed for the size I can do.