• August 2025 Turning Challenge: Wooden Version of Non-Wood Item! (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Nino Cocchiarella for "Three Sisters" being selected as Turning of the Week for August 18, 2025 (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

What am I looking at here?

Joined
Aug 13, 2025
Messages
11
Likes
19
Location
Loveland, CO
Grabbed 3 BIG chunks of this from the wood pile at the recycle center. I am no arborist, so unless I know the actual source of the wood, can see the leaves, or it is REALLY obvious sometimes I can't tell.

Anyhow, phone app says cherry. We don't have a ton of cherry around here (or if we do it gets grabbed up quick from my source) but wanted some opinions.

thanks all!

--Scott

log2.jpg
log1.jpg
 
Yep! Took these pics when I got home after I salvaged these. Anchorseal since applied 👍 Cracks don't look like they are too deep so hopefully will be worth turning.
 
Could also be honey locust. To check, use a black (UV) light and check for fluorescence. Honey and black locust will both show a bright yellow to yellow green.

Additionally, while your wife is sniffing, honey locust to me smells like warm spices, kind of like mulling spices.
 
I strongly agree - look at the end grain.
Follow the instructions in section 7 here:
I wouldn't sand, since that can fill open pores and hide small pores, rays, and parenchyma, the wood database article tells about this. All that is needed is clean end grain and a small magnifier lens.

You can use a sharp knife to prepare the end grain but I find a single-edge razor blade better, as recommended in R. Bruce Hoadley's book "Identifying Wood". I buy them in packages of 100!

Only a small sample of end grain is needed, enough to examine two or three rings. I usually cut a piece just big enough to hold.

If the choice is between the guesses cherry and locust, for example, examining the endgrain would make that easy - cherry is distinctively diffuse porous while locust (honey or black) is ring porous. The black locust has pores chock full of easy-to-see tyloses, honey locust doesn't. Both fluoresce green under UV light and cherry doesn't. (I use 365nm UV flashlights.)

The bark looks far more like cherry than locust, but bark can be highly variable on different trees, different parts of the same tree, how it grew, if it was damaged at some point.

Or just cut it up, see how much good wood remains, and turn it! Call it "tree wood" :)

JKJ
 
Looks like cherry or maybe apricot. I would turn it as soon as possible, at least cut it up into blanks.
 
I'm in agreement with @JohnKJordan and @TimConnell with their suggestion. Looks like Honey Locust, especially by looking at the bark. Locust bark has deep recesses, just like the log that sits behind your half-cut image. My experience with this wood is turn it green once to final thickness. If you turn it dry, it will be a very unpleasant event. Imagine trying to turn a block of concrete.
 
I'm in agreement with @JohnKJordan and @TimConnell with their suggestion. Looks like Honey Locust, especially by looking at the bark. Locust bark has deep recesses, just like the log that sits behind your half-cut image. My experience with this wood is turn it green once to final thickness. If you turn it dry, it will be a very unpleasant event. Imagine trying to turn a block of concrete.
I agree, Donna. It looks very much like honey locust to me. And yes, I have turned dry, honey locust and it is very much like concrete!
 
And yes, I have turned dry, honey locust and it is very much like concrete!

Odd, I almost only turn dry wood - I cut logs sections like that into blanks and don't turn until they're dry. I don't remember anything unusual with dry locust, osage, and other hard woods. Maybe I use different tools. Or turn smaller things.

I remember a guy in our club speaking in "cursive" about turning a large bowl from dry hickory!

Ever turn dry Lyptus? (Plantation-grown eucalyptus hybrid)

One guy compared IT to concrete and swore sparks were coming off the piece he had on the lathe. I'd never heard of Lyptus and said I wanted to try. Instead he gave me the his 2nd blank. I made a bowl. This was almost 20 years ago, having fun experimenting with designs.

lyptus_bowl.jpg

JKJ
 
The bigger pieces look like black locust to me. Are all three supposed to be from the same tree?
 
The OP's home town has lots of good sized thornless/seedless honey locust. "Canada red cherry" (Prunus virginiana), is a horticultural cherry family member akin to chokecherry that could also look like that and is not rare in the area.
 
Thanks all for the replies! Update on my thoughts:

I cannot be sure the tree pieces are all from the same tree. I snagged them at the recycle center near each other, but there is no way to know. 100% of the what I KNOW to be honey locust I have found locally and turned has bark that looks like this image (Googlefu says this is thornless HL) - lots of texture and channels in the bark.

hl.png

And the ring lines are tight and confined to the middle of the wood, not broad and spread out like the image I shared in the post. Here are two pieces I have turned:

honeylocust.jpg



Here is another look at the bark of one of the other pieces:

bark.jpg

What's funny, is I can find internet images of other locust varieties AS WELL AS cherry that match this bark exactly, so it is well within the realm of possibility it is a HL but a type I have never come across before - I've only been turning 8 months!

Wife's smell test was inconclusive. "Maybe slightly sweet, but no real strong notes??"

I will try a 10x picture tomorrow, but thanks for sleuthing this with me!

--Scott
 
Last edited:
The OP's home town has lots of good sized thornless/seedless honey locust. "Canada red cherry" (Prunus virginiana), is a horticultural cherry family member akin to chokecherry that could also look like that and is not rare in the area.

Interestingly, Loveland, Co has a pretty rich cherry history. I am surprised I don't run across more of it:

"Loveland, CO, was once the center of a massive cherry industry, with over 10,000 acres of orchards in its peak period, from the late 1800s through the 1960s. The city, which held the largest orchard west of the Mississippi, produced over a million dollars in cherries annually in the 1920s, supported several canning factories, and even held a Cherry Blossom Festival. "

--Scott
 
Back
Top