• The forum upgrades have been completed. These were moderate security fixes from our software vendor and it looks like everything is working well. If you see any problems please post in the Forum Technical Support forum or email us at forum_moderator (at) aawforum.org. Thank you
  • April 2026 Turning Challenge: Salad Bowl! (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to David Bartell, People's Choice in the March 2026 Turning Challenge (click here for details)
  • Congratulations to Gianni Di Gregorio for "Simple Piercing" being selected as Turning of the Week for April 20, 2026 (click here for details)
  • Welcome new registering member. Your username must be your real First and Last name (for example: John Doe). "Screen names" and "handles" are not allowed and your registration will be deleted if you don't use your real name. Also, do not use all caps nor all lower case.

water glass

Some of the old treatments/chemicals can still have a good use. Calcium soap is one - WW2 and earlier used on Navy ships for rust prevention. My source is Lee Alox Bullet Lube, thinned ~20:1. This one not so much for wood. AI info:

“Sodium silicate” (often called water glass) absolutely was used on wood in the late 1800s through mid-1900s—but it faded out for some very practical reasons.


What it did (and why people liked it)​


https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/U3PvktBxaXZIHbaC1bPYtatSml9c4qklYvrXcY2NIX3zRMc4xw692AxaNd0-HUtq6T2NkkdcOfUe9Nrr16ENSX-bJ7bnoVzjYPGY5UAUEs7u_8EGncURBqs_JwIFcX9HdRXSRns6eUjhTyI0NQOiBKt1ny_g83WxaAym4wa9djD17eiJ0MYcfo8z46bIHiYK?purpose=fullsize

https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/CEhV2BRyQQtz8ulQ2O5VM3U0p9lg725dVf7Uu6UDXfiaNqLeAe36xDE2V_ch8cZxfIVpBbkcJQw2iF33UBff6aHUfanphGvfV4jX-JcO42JECjZk5sxTaA5T8Ses7vSTv9alGkeUAoQAxWgTHCOI1fEoibAqs3kirVZVpCtgVNfApWdekLAsnEgF7Camiw6i?purpose=fullsize

https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/ufIHp58XgqOPmkavdvxglZp_pc2lNHP-f52sLALmvVXj8n2KgbA5njMCUZCMGlBIASYKMS0woKWl_PSDGt6r_WaUKT-k2a5G7RxAxJMRrKB3B-YxeLkGr-0pzI3cDJeKbl3HsuOfjbvfzTdXJWOoj_rSpwT7DsUt_qiUOeZ7dh6t5Wy0LLRMde_zY_0kjn91?purpose=fullsize

6

Back then, it was attractive because it was:


  • Cheap and widely available
  • Non-flammable
  • Somewhat insect- and mold-resistant
  • Added limited fire resistance (it forms a mineral-like layer)

Chemically, it soaks into wood pores and dries into a glassy silica network—basically turning part of the surface into something closer to mineral than organic.




Why it fell out of favor for wood​


Short version: it kind of worked, but modern chemistry works far better.


1) Moisture sensitivity (biggest issue)​


  • Sodium silicate is water-soluble again after curing (especially with humidity exposure).
  • That means:
    • It can leach out over time
    • Protection isn’t permanent outdoors
  • Compared to modern sealers, it’s not a true waterproofing system

2) Surface problems​


  • Leaves a brittle, chalky/glassy film
  • Can:
    • Crack
    • Flake
    • Create a rough feel
  • Not great for anything you want to look good or last structurally

3) Poor durability vs modern options​


By the 1940s–1960s, better treatments showed up:


  • Oil-based preservatives (e.g., creosote, pentachlorophenol)
  • Pressure-treated lumber (CCA, later ACQ, etc.)
  • Modern polymer sealers and epoxies

Those:


  • Penetrate deeper
  • Stay in place
  • Handle weather cycles far better

4) Limited biological protection​


  • It’s mildly resistant to fungi/insects, but not nearly as effective as modern preservatives
  • It doesn’t actively kill organisms the way later chemicals do

5) Alkalinity issues​


  • Highly alkaline → can:
    • Damage finishes applied over it
    • Cause long-term fiber degradation in some conditions



Why it is still used (just not much on wood)​


https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/6NqFB0Bc-d_04Qas-n3QlPItV57ftIXNVImTInxKN0og6nBuzyOdDcPOibLHP0YXL7Ny01WHsNsXA0wUZU18dWtzI8ril-X0fml7693v5fks4vtHmwjOHk2bb6SkgIC_C-6LqpFsBNbMoALgTFIH400hF0Ect0feThCARIf3z8JHJCIDK3iwosKRiwzCqpFy?purpose=fullsize

https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/fT_T5WZU0M4XXzULTWWFOnhzdK3psCHUp6lWNCiFP8fJoWa0Ofc66QZIiZ_0w6LKOHQG2BEWhnSYW63WR6S9YpFj7OVdkVf7MSVSa6ywa9vlePxFqCHO7N5F9H7bMIlkk_aJAswsWyRJNNPqL4CavPnKrYpUE3YvSNSgQ31iw596orKfXCOfAGXi0k2_hu9C?purpose=fullsize

https://images.openai.com/static-rsc-4/wE4iYJC9G3wE1MUF89EF3Agci14vaxuhPE9_eVETeJ8lhyutrATSYk84U4sFdTiqNBoD9vaQA2YKHhttzhjkQZYc_CunUuDDMeV4A4WDatr3HatddXlCOwcw3dDvD8TmqbVHBztagR0guzeNYPfVNUWaXkwXD04IJt8Hh1tGhxqBZQsjCbr3SDiVn1JSvqaz?purpose=fullsize

5

It didn’t disappear—it just found better applications.


Concrete (where it shines)​


  • Reacts with calcium hydroxide in concrete → forms calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H)
  • That:
    • Hardens the surface
    • Reduces dusting
    • Improves durability

This is why it’s still common as a concrete densifier/sealer


Other uses​


  • Fireproof coatings (industrial)
  • Refractory cements
  • Egg preservation (old-school trick)
  • Adhesives and binders



Is it used on wood today at all?​


Very niche:


  • Some DIY fire-retardant treatments
  • Occasional use in historic restoration
  • Experimental “mineralization” treatments

But in real-world construction or woodworking?
It’s basically obsolete.




Bottom line (straight answer)​


Sodium silicate fell out of use on wood because:


  • It doesn’t stay stable with moisture
  • It forms a brittle, mediocre protective layer
  • It was outclassed by pressure treatments and modern sealers

It survived in concrete because the chemistry there actually improves the material permanently, instead of just coating it.
 
Back
Top